Is this setup working well ? The problem I see with it is that user1,user2,user3 ... won't have their own database., they'll all use default_user's one.
Am I mistaken ? If I'm right, it means we'll 'sacrifice' them because they won't have their own token database anymore. On Friday 05 January 2007 09:09, you wrote: > I think I got it: > > > <...> > default_user:merged:*,-user1,-user2,-user3,-user4,-user5 > default_user:shared:user1,user2,user3,user4,user5 > <...> > > > > Now when one of the mentioned users retrains a message, I see the stats > in the database for default_user change. > > > Robin
