Marc Cousin wrote: > Is this setup working well ?
Not yet. I have removed all users execpt myself; they were complaining :) > The problem I see with it is that user1,user2,user3 ... won't have their own > database., they'll all use default_user's one. > > Am I mistaken ? If I'm right, it means we'll 'sacrifice' them because they > won't have their own token database anymore. Correct. I found no other way unfortunately, and response to my question was also sparse. I have the impression that every time I do something 'big' in my dspam config, dspam gets really confused and misses a lot of spam. Then again, it might be that I have all users' training mode set to 'toe', and do some purging every night, so it might as well be that dspam only has a record for spam, and no ham, and handles mail with more 'care' because it has no ham-reference material. I'm speculating about dspam internals here :) Wat I have now is <...> default_user:merged:*,-user1 default_user:shared:user1 <...> and training mode for all users set to 'toe', except for default_user and user1, which are set to 'tum'. I now expect dspam to keep the default_user dictionary somewhat up-to-date even with purging old data. It's a bit of a pain in the *ss that every time I try something it takes a couple of days to see if it turned out well. And an even bigger pain if it turns out to not work so well :) Robin
