Thanks that's helpful. It still seems like it would be helpful to have the whitelist tokens maintained in a table and the ability to mark an email as whitelisted rather than just innocent or spam, but that's just my opinion.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:16:10 +0200, Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Samuel Clough wrote, on 26. mar 2007 13:35: > >> Ok, just for my understanding, does whitelist not mean that dspam trusts > the from address? If not, what does whitelist mean? > > [...] > > Acually, the README says under "feature": > > 'whitelist: Automatic whitelisting. DSPAM will keep track of the entire > "From:" line for each message received per user, and automatically > whitelist messages from senders with more than 10 innocent > messages and zero spams. Once the user reports a spam from the > sender, automatic whitelisting will automatically be deactivated > for that sender. Since DSPAM uses the entire "From:" line, and > not just the sender's email address, automatic whitelisting is > a very safe approach to improving accuracy during initial training.' > > Best, > > --Tonni > > -- > Tony Earnshaw > Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl > > !DSPAM:4607b9b339402469312606!
