Hi DSPAMs users!
We have decided to deploy DSPAM as anti-spam software in a mail server with thousands of users. In a first machine, message is analyzed by SpamAssassin, however this result is not used. In a second machine, the message is analyzed with DSPAM and if the message is spam the Subject field of the header is changed with the tag -SPAM (spamSubject=-SPAM- in /var/spool/dspam/default.prefs). We use global groups. To create a global classification group, we added grupoJA:classification:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to /var/spool/dspam/group and we set <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s> [EMAIL PROTECTED] preferences so that trainigMode is set to TOE. During the tests we obtained the following results: >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 25 13:39:21 2008 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:39:21 +0100 Received: from root by ccobuz01 with spam-scanned (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1JTcc5-0005BW-NL for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:39:21 +0100 Received: from [10.240.229.43] (helo=guadix3.juntadeandalucia.es) by ccobuz01 with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1JTcc5-0005BM-IX for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:39:21 +0100 Received: from [10.240.225.254] (helo=mail.juntadeandalucia.es) by guadix3.juntadeandalucia.es with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1JTcha-0001QJ-1R for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:45:02 +0100 Received: from [83.6.28.124] (helo=drw178.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl) by mail.juntadeandalucia.es with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1JTchU-0005lM-LV for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lun, 25 feb 2008 13:45:01 +0100 Received: from 66.28.227.61 (HELO MAIL2.PAALP.com) by juntadeandalucia.es with esmtp (JAWBUHTFBNHM NVJXT) id WC3oZI-LZhBxE-l5 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:44:55 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Horace Pena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sherman Beck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: -SPAM- Life without illness is possible! Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:44:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_22467_582D_01C877B4.9AEBEA70" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1441 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Spam-Score: -99 X-Spam-Score-Int: -99 X-My-Dspam: scanned by ccobuz01, Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:39:21 +0100 X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Mon Feb 25 13:39:21 2008 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.6000 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 47c2b6f954881457812391 We would like to know what is the behavior of DSPAM in these cases. Thank you very much.
