> Hi DSPAM’s users!
>
>
>
> We have decided to deploy DSPAM as anti-spam software in a mail server with
> thousands of users.
>
> In a first machine, message is analyzed by SpamAssassin, however this result
> is not used. In a second machine, the message is analyzed with DSPAM and if
> the message is spam the Subject field of the header is changed with the tag
> -SPAM – (spamSubject=-SPAM- in /var/spool/dspam/default.prefs).
>
> We use global groups. To create a global classification group, we added
> grupoJA:classification:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to
> /var/spool/dspam/group and we set
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] preferences so that trainigMode is
> set to TOE.
>
>
>
> During the tests we obtained the following results:
>
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 25 13:39:21 2008
>
> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:39:21 +0100
>
> Received: from root by ccobuz01 with spam-scanned (Exim 4.68)
>
>             (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>             id 1JTcc5-0005BW-NL
>
>             for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Feb 2008
> 13:39:21 +0100
>
> Received: from [10.240.229.43] (helo=guadix3.juntadeandalucia.es)
>
>             by ccobuz01 with esmtp (Exim 4.68)
>
>             (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>             id 1JTcc5-0005BM-IX
>
>             for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Feb 2008
> 13:39:21 +0100
>
> Received: from [10.240.225.254] (helo=mail.juntadeandalucia.es)
>
>             by guadix3.juntadeandalucia.es with esmtps
> (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
>
>             (Exim 4.60)
>
>             (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>             id 1JTcha-0001QJ-1R
>
>             for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Feb 2008
> 13:45:02 +0100
>
> Received: from [83.6.28.124] (helo=drw178.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl)
>
>             by mail.juntadeandalucia.es with smtp (Exim 4.60)
>
>             (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>             id 1JTchU-0005lM-LV
>
>             for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lun, 25 feb 2008
> 13:45:01 +0100
>
> Received: from 66.28.227.61 (HELO MAIL2.PAALP.com)
>
>      by juntadeandalucia.es with esmtp (JAWBUHTFBNHM NVJXT)
>
>      id WC3oZI-LZhBxE-l5
>
>      for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:44:55
> +0100
>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> From: "Horace Pena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> To: "Sherman Beck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Subject: -SPAM- Life without illness is possible!
>
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:44:55 +0100
>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>
>         boundary="----=_NextPart_22467_582D_01C877B4.9AEBEA70"
>
> X-Priority: 3
>
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1441
>
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
>
> X-Spam-Score: -99
>
> X-Spam-Score-Int: -99
>
> X-My-Dspam: scanned by ccobuz01, Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:39:21 +0100
>
> X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
>
> X-DSPAM-Processed: Mon Feb 25 13:39:21 2008
>
> X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.6000
>
> X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023
>
> X-DSPAM-Signature: 47c2b6f954881457812391
>
>
>
> We would like to know what is the behavior of DSPAM in these cases. Thank
> you very much.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


It's clear that dspam thinks this message is NOT spam so lets try and figure it
out.

What programs do you have scanning your emails before dspam?  How are you
running dspam? Was this message sent to the user or were you training dspam with
a public corps?


Reply via email to