I'll answer what I think I can Ken, and chop the rest... others can 
reply to your original message.

ken cleaver wrote:

> Does it seem like there is significant growth in dstar? Are there other
> manufacturers adopting?
> 
> [ED - http://www.dstarusers.org/dsm_growth.html 
> <http://www.dstarusers.org/dsm_growth.html> ]

That's interesting -- around 16:00 UTC it started DOWN, and stopped at 
around 0:00 UTC?  "Max    801     Average    757     Current    705  "

Was that the Dayton systems going "bye-bye" after the show?

> How is the IC-92AD radio? I have been running a VX-5 radio for a while.

There was a discussion of multiple rigs here on the list a while back, 
but a number of folks here have IC-92ADs... they bought them before the 
repeater went up, played with voice/data on simplex.

Then the repeater went up, and we're all completely hooked... most of us 
were back at the store within weeks,   buying ID-800Hs for mobile use.

> Do you set the digital call sign squelch with your ID for people calling
> you? Or with others you expect to be calling?

Very few people are using any of the two digital squelch types around 
here yet.  I suspect looking them over, the more popular one will be the 
callsign-based one, and only when you "only want to hear calls for your 
station"... my wife, for example, who's a ham, has expressed interest in 
having a memory channel for "normal" listening, and one that turns on 
the callsign-based squelch so she'll only be "bothered" if one of us 
calls her directly.

> Is the range better or worse with dstar then the analog 2m/70cm?

That's a huge debate.  The real answer is "it depends".  Like anything 
new, digital is completely different.  Mark N5RFX recently posted this 
article that covers it QUICKLY (leaving out the more complex problems 
like digital multipath, etc...) and fairly accurately by measuring 
receiver "sensitivity":

ftp://ftp.tapr.org/psr/psr105.pdf

See page 4 and 5.  We would agree here, that you gain that "extra 17db" 
of no noise, no flutter, no problems, and then the coverage just drops 
off... just like one would expect from something fully digital. 
Honestly, we can't believe the coverage from our low test site here in 
Colorado... and we can't wait to get the repeater another couple of 
thousand feet higher!

> Is there any background noise? Or is it digital clear?

Whatever the mic pics up... you can still hear "road noise" on a mobile, 
but it's subdued through most of the Icom mics (they still did a decent 
job on the noise canceling mics themselves) and "digital clear"... well, 
yes... if someone's fully in the repeater.  They drive through a "dead 
spot" where even an analog repeater would fall out, and they're going to 
do what is being nicknamed... "R2-D2" (like the robot noises in Star 
Wars), "Going Digital", or "Garbled".

> Does audio disappear completely when on the fringe?

Kinda.  Not always.  If the repeater loses frame sync on the signal, it 
sometimes sends some really weird stuff on for a second or so.  Remember 
also your LOCAL receiver can lose the signal.  (For example... transmit 
on another high power UHF rig on another nearby antenna -- causing 
standard RF receiver desense -- to your Icom rig, and the repeater 
itself will "garble out" on your end, but not for others listening in. 
You can also sometimes "hear" the forward error correction and minor 
amounts of lost packets in the stream... it makes the person sound a 
tiny bit "fuzzy" for a short period of time.  Sometimes -- you can't 
quite tell which end had the problem, too... of course.  We've only been 
up and on the air a couple of weeks, but it seems everyone is taking 
these funny noises in stride... if you happen to put your D-STAR 
repeater where other analog repeaters are and can "correlate" the 
coverage, you'll find that where the analog is generally noisy, but 
still copyable, the D-STAR will be rock solid for voice.

The inter-mixed low speed data channel at 1200 bps is not error 
corrected and often looks worse than the voice.  We're still playing 
with the differences in "voice coverage" versus "data coverage" a little 
bit.

If you are going for the ultimate in weak-signal copy, analog still 
wins... but most people aren't going to stick around and listen to a QSO 
that nasty on analog repeaters anyway...


> Since the radio does ident do you need to ident verbally? Does it display
> who is currently transmitting?

Remember there are multiple countries and rules.  Best practice is 
always to continue to use your callsign in voice.  However, at least 
here in the U.S. folks are pretty convinced that not voice IDing as long 
as the rig has the correct callsign in it, isn't necessary.

> Can you open a link and listen to other repeaters? Or can you just open it
> for a specific call sign?

Linking isn't in the stock Icom Gateway, but with the addition by the 
local Gateway admin of the DPlus software, linking to another repeater 
so that ALL traffic on either one goes back and forth, and/or linking to 
one of the new "Reflectors" where multiple Gateway-equipped repeaters 
can link up, is possible.

Additionally, remember that because it requires Internet at the repeater 
site to have a Gateway, there are quite a few D-STAR repeaters out there 
that are NOT Gateway-equipped.  Check in your local area first, before 
thinking you'll be able to get out to the world.

> When transmitting data, if data is lost does it automatically do a
> retransmit?

No.  The radios send low-speed data non-error-corrected.  But... 
applications written to talk OVER that half-duplex 1200 bps data pipe 
can (and have started to) implement their own "retry" system and layer.


> On the last heard site http://www.dstarusers.org/lastheard.php 
> <http://www.dstarusers.org/lastheard.php> Is that the
> last time they used the repeater, or used it as a gateway?

The last time they transmitted on that repeater with the local 
repeater's Gateway callsign in the RPT2 field of their rig.  (If you 
don't route to the Gateway -- if you have one -- DV Dongle users 
connected to your Gateway don't hear you, etc.  It's becoming 
commonplace for folks to have their "default" settings as:

UR: CQCQCQ
RPT1: [Local repeater Callsign and port in eighth character field.]
RPT2" [Local repeater Callsign and Gateway "G" in eighth character field.]
Your: Their own callsign.

> Also on last heard there is a letter after the reporting node, either a B or
> a C. What does that letter mean?

Generally...

A = 1.2 GHz
B = UHF
C = VHF

Nate WY0X

Reply via email to