This is getting real interesting, general quires expanded to fit ones 
illusions of total license operation No.? Referenced 97.115 (b) concerns 3rd 
party traffic I believe under supervision and Control of a control Op. Sounds 
like one of those test questions on the Extra test. it goes back to the 
question is the originator or the relaying station license holder held 
responsible? And what of the recipient station? ( if said station passes on 
traffic) When in doubt. diplomatically decline such traffic. A whole can of 
worms in the broad sense. Common Sense should prevail. To err in the 
conservative is better than to err with penalties or license loss.


 73,
Tom


 

-----Original Message-----
From: bruce mallon <wa4...@yahoo.com>
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 9:52 am
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Follow-Up on U.S. Regulations










so anyone can use ham radio without a license ????

--- On Mon, 12/29/08, Craig <wd5...@amsat.org> wrote:

From: Craig <wd5...@amsat.org>
Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Follow-Up on U.S. Regulations
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, December 29, 2008, 8:58 AM







FCC regulation 97.115(b) says that non hams may use ham radio 
frequencies.

http://www.arrl. org/FandES/ field/regulation s/news/part97/

bruce mallon <wa4...@...> wrote:
>
> So does this meen that if your digital you can allow non hams 
use?of ham frequencies. ..

> 
> From: k7ve <j...@...>

> > I don't know / have not heard about the FCC
> > specifically allowing ordering a pizza over
> > an auto patch or similar activities. 
> > 
> 
> It was big news when the change in the regulations were made, this 
was
> probably over 10-20 years ago. They of course, don't codify the 
words
> "you can order pizza" in the regs, but I believe it revolves around
> 97.113a3 -- you cannot operate such that it is a financial gain
> (pecuniary interest) to yourself or your employer. So the reasoning
> goes, if you don't own or work for the pizza shop, you can order a
> pizza over an autopatch. 
> 
> This is mentioned in the ARRL article at
> http://www.arrl. org/FandES/ field/regulation s/phone-patch. html 
(item 2)
> 

 














      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

Please TRIM your replies or set your email program not to include the original  
message in reply unless needed for clarity.  ThanksYahoo! Groups Links





 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to