>I have heard DiskWarrior can suceed where all other rebuilding and 
>recovery programs fail?  Has anyone had success with DiskWarrior?  Would 
>you recommend it?

Although not specific to your situation, here's what I read somewhere and 
what I have experienced with DiskWarrior:
- Running DiskWarrior *first* will repair/rebuild the directory.
  Norton or TechTool can then be applied to fix damaged individual files.
  (In my experience, DiskWarrior has so far always successfully rebuilt 
the directory whenever I applied it first. But has not always been true 
if applied second or third - see next.)
- If Norton or TechTool is applied first, then DiskWarrior may not have 
much left to work with since Norton and TechTool may affect (for the 
worse) the directory it's trying to fix.
  (In my experience, before making DiskWarrior consistently my first line 
of attack, one time I ran Norton and then tried DiskWarrior but all was 
lost. Another time I ran both TechTool and then Norton and also Disk 
First Aid with no luck, finally running DiskWarrior and again couldn't 
recover the directory.)

So, I doubt DiskWarrior will help you now -- and in your specific case, 
i.e., SCSI disk mode -- but you can always try. Besides which it might be 
a good investment to get it now for the next time you need to run a disk 
utility.
----------
Duo/2400 List, The friendliest place on the Net!
A listserv for users and fans of Mac subportables.
FAQ at <http://www.themacintoshguy.com/lists/DuoListFAQ.shtml>
Be sure to visit Mac2400! <http://www.sineware.com/mac2400>

X-Router | Share your DSL or cable modem between multiple computers! 
Dr. Bott |  <http://www.drbott.com/prod/MIH120.html>

PowerBook Guy is          |      Click here!
Everything PowerBook!     |      http://www.powerbookguy.com

Midwest Mac Parts  ][  <http://www.midwestmac.com>  
After-market parts  for Macs.   ][  888-356-1104 ][

MacResQ Reader Specials: 2.5GB Seagate SCSI: $119, 4GB IBM SCSI: $199, 
Norton Util. 4.0: $29, Mac Parts, Systems & Repairs <http://www.macresq.com>

 

Reply via email to