At 3:17 PM -0700 6/13/00, Jose Dalisay wrote:
>just curious--i was going through the 2400c's specs in an old apple pdf file
>and saw that it was designed to have 4 MB ROM; when i did techtool and
>tattlecheck tests on mine, the ROM was consistently 3 MB. did apple downgrade
>its specs, or did i just lose 1 MB to thin air? (not that i notice the
>difference--but if i did lose something, is this the sign of a problem in the
>making?)

The physical size of the ROM is 4MB, but Apple usually only filled 
about 3MB of it, and that's what the test is reporting.

   Tim Seufert
----------
Duo/2400 List, The friendliest place on the Net!
A listserv for users and fans of Mac subportables.
FAQ at <http://www.themacintoshguy.com/lists/DuoListFAQ.shtml>
Be sure to visit Mac2400! <http://www.sineware.com/mac2400>

 XRouter | Share your DSL or cable modem between multiple computers! 
Dr. Bott | Now $199.99      <http://www.drbott.com/prod/MIH120.html>

PowerBook Guy is          |      Click here!
Everything PowerBook!     |      http://www.powerbookguy.com

Midwest Mac Parts  ][  <http://www.midwestmac.com>  
After-market parts  for Macs.   ][  888-356-1104 ][

MacResQ Reader Specials: 2.5GB Seagate SCSI: $119, 4GB IBM SCSI: $199, 
Norton Util. 4.0: $29, Mac Parts, Systems & Repairs <http://www.macresq.com>

 

Reply via email to