Sorry for the loooong delay ... "Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now, of course, I wonder if: > 1. my fix to `tla-revision-sync-tree' is right; Seems to be. I've applied it to my local branch. We used to have a very lispish way to represent revisions, with tons of (car (cddr (cadr (whatever)))), which are now in a cleaner defstruct. Bet weakly typed language insist in letting you run the broken code untill it actually breaks, so I probably missed some occurences of this pattern when I did the change. > 2. I should fix the same way other similar occurrences in `tla.el'. Most probably so, yes. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
