> >> The paper work for FSF is being done background by Michael Olson and > >> I. I'll report progress when we get progresses. > > > > I'm very sorry to be late. > > Could you someone take over the task? > > I'd like to step back from the task. > > Thanks for the effort you've put into this so far. > > I could take over the Emacs merge effort. I got ERC into Emacs, so it > shouldn't be too hard to get DVC in.
Thank you very much. > > I think some of functions of DVC should be implemented in vc or > > vc-dired. There are some duplicated code and function among DVC and > > VC. e.g. annotation. Maybe DVC's annotation implementation is better > > because DVC does most of things asynchronously. > > I dislike vc because of its non-asynchronous behavior Maybe this is the most important point. > and file-based rather than commit-based view of working directories. > I doubt that DVC and vc can have any code in common, but I could be > wrong. It would be better IMHO just to get DVC into Emacs as-is. Just a question. Have you ever tired M-x vc-directory(= vc-dired)? I think I can say vc-directory provides `commit-based view'. Am I wrong? The biggest weak points of vc-dired are it cannot handle multiple files and cannot run asynchronously. As you wrote removing the later one is difficult. However I think I can remove the former one. Masatake _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
