Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > I think some of functions of DVC should be implemented in vc or >> > vc-dired. There are some duplicated code and function among DVC and >> > VC. e.g. annotation. Maybe DVC's annotation implementation is better >> > because DVC does most of things asynchronously. >> >> I dislike vc because of its non-asynchronous behavior > > Maybe this is the most important point. > >> and file-based rather than commit-based view of working directories. >> I doubt that DVC and vc can have any code in common, but I could be >> wrong. It would be better IMHO just to get DVC into Emacs as-is. > > Just a question. Have you ever tired M-x vc-directory(= vc-dired)? > I think I can say vc-directory provides `commit-based view'. > Am I wrong? > > The biggest weak points of vc-dired are it cannot handle multiple > files and cannot run asynchronously. As you wrote removing the later > one is difficult. However I think I can remove the former one.
I tried vc-dired also yesterday. One negative aspect is, that seemd to have opend many many files, now is the recent file list (I use recentf) filled with files I never use. This is also a point that must be fixed with vc-dired. Stefan. _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
