Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stephen Leake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Ok. >> >> How should this information be displayed in DVC? > > IMO, it should just be displayed in a way similar to what the command > line does. The ewoc structure used for status allows "messages", so we > can have > > '(message "On branch ...") > '(message "Changes to be committed:") > '(file "file1" ....) > '(file "another-file" ....) > '(message "Changed but not updated") > ...
I don't think there is any need for this. I've already made it so that
files which aren't in the index have a "?" in the second display column
of the status output. I think it makes sense visually.
--
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 |
http://mwolson.org/ -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net | /` |\ | | |
Sysadmin -- Hobbies: Lisp, GP2X, HCoop | |_] | \| |_|
Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner |
pgpiu4RT60lOy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
