I personally think tags and interests should stay separate. I use both very differently and integrating the two together would confuse me.
This is just my little opinion though. It's about as disposable as tissue. ;) (No, I don't think self-deprecating comments are hip. But I do like to make sure that other people know I am aware of the facts and in this case, the facts are that my opinion is one of many, many, many. *wink*) - Chasy. + + + ><> + + + "Faith is to believe what we do not see, and the reward of faith is to see what we believe." - Saint Augustine "My God is so big, so strong and so mighty, there's nothing my God cannot do." - favorite children's song. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Azure Lunatic <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:43 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > If my interests were judged by my tags and their frequency, it would > > appear that I am absolutely fascinated by memes and have never heard > > of speculative fiction other than Harry Potter. So merging my > > interests with my tags probably isn't gonna work too well. > > Supposing one were able to cherrypick interests from tags? Say, choose > up to 150 (using LJ's number) of one's favorite tags for display as > interests, with the option to helpfully sort by frequency of use when > selecting. > > That might not work so well in some cases, however, because I am > fairly sure that there are things that I am interested in (reading > about, thinking about, talking about in comments) and have listed as > LJ interests that I've never posted about or created tags for on my > own. > > --Azz > _______________________________________________ > dw-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss >
_______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
