On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Azure Lunatic wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:43 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If my interests were judged by my tags and their frequency, it would
> > appear that I am absolutely fascinated by memes and have never heard
> > of speculative fiction other than Harry Potter. So merging my
> > interests with my tags probably isn't gonna work too well.
>
> Supposing one were able to cherrypick interests from tags? Say, choose
> up to 150 (using LJ's number) of one's favorite tags for display as
> interests, with the option to helpfully sort by frequency of use when
> selecting.

Then, you'd have to have standardised tags if you wanted people
to find you based on interests.  All my snarky tags would have to
go :( and I would really hate that.

(I am starting to get into the habit of using tags consistently.
But they are rarely things like "heroes", "work", "politics" or
"israel" and far more often things like "oh tim kring no", "life
at princeton-plainsboro", "i want my country back" and "yes I am
a zionist".)

> That might not work so well in some cases, however, because I
> am fairly sure that there are things that I am interested in
> (reading about, thinking about, talking about in comments) and
> have listed as LJ interests that I've never posted about or
> created tags for on my own.

Yeah.  I don't have a tag for a lot of the things I have listed
as interests.

****************************************************************
Azalais Aranxta (~malfoy)
ataniell93 on LiveJournal and Vox
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/malfoymadness

"I know the true world, and you know I do. But we needn't let it
think we all bow down." --Christopher Fry
_______________________________________________
dw-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss

Reply via email to