[email protected] wrote:
>>> Adding another voice to the "folks who use mobile browsing", LJ has
>>> had this nasty habit lately of setting cookies with javascript (I
>>> think), which means that anybody on a Windows Mobile 6.0-and-earlier
>>> browser can't stay logged in. Even after you log in, your flist shows
>>> up as if you hadn't, and you can't see "warning warning adult
>>> warning!" stuff, because you can't get LJ to accept it when you say
>>> "Yes, I'm over 18".
>>>
>
> I don't use mobile browsing, or posting by e-mail, but I do regularly use
> both semagic for posting and lj-sec to synch my journals. I use IJ as a
> backup for my LJ, in case it ever gets hacked so I don't lose everything,
> and semagic and LJ-sec make it easy to do so. I would like to continue to
> be able to do that; will that be available? It's not a huge problem if it
> isn't, but it would be handy if it was.
>
> Beatrice Otter
> _______________________________________________
> dw-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
>
>
Yes, I use Semagic and LJSec as well. Is there any reason why the
clients that work with LJ and clones shouldn't work with DW?
_______________________________________________
dw-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
