On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Philip Newton wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 04:14, Azalais Aranxta <[email protected]> wrote:
> > (We could live with that, if the software would allow us to
> > actually date things in the 1940s
>
> Which reminds me -- is January 2038 considered "the end of time" as on
> LiveJournal?
>
> IIRC, Dreamwidth will be 64-bit throughout, so hopefully their time_t
> (or whatever is used) will also be 64-bit and will not suffer from
> Y2.038K.

I'm not actually sure that's the reason we can't put
game-chronology timestamps on things, because 1942 is after 1939.
If LJ allowed dates between 1939 and 2038, there'd be no reason I
couldn't say I was posting in 1942, and I don't think it will let
me.  There's got to be some other thing in the code that prevents
us from doing this.

LJ allows birthdates as far back as 1890.  I don't really
understand why I'm allowed to have one character say that her
birthdate is in 1892 but 1888 is not okay!

> But that would also open the door to timestamps in the 1940s --
> or indeed BC timestamps, if users want to use them! (Or from
> the 35th century.)

Apparently not.

I do know you can timestamp in the 1970s.  But not on
communities.  (I've run across Marauders-era HP games with posts
dated 1977-1980, but they weren't using a community.)

Kiri :)

****************************************************************
Azalais Aranxta (~malfoy)
ataniell93 on LiveJournal and Vox
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/malfoymadness

"I know the true world, and you know I do. But we needn't let it
think we all bow down." --Christopher Fry
_______________________________________________
dw-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss

Reply via email to