Denise Paolucci wrote: > > On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Xenacryst wrote: > >> msilverstar wrote: >>> The "read-only" status seems like a really good idea, as an >>> alternative to temporary deletion. >> >> I was just thinking the other day that having a deleted journal be able >> to give a custom message (if desired) would be really nice at times -- >> "I've deleted and gone away for a couple of weeks for a sanity break; >> will be back." Instead of the rather nondescript "this journal has been >> deleted" message. But a read-only designation could be similarly useful. > > http://bugs.dwscoalition.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480
You guys are just waaaay too far ahead of me. *hearts* --x _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
