Ok. You're I stand down.

On 4/16/09, Azalais Aranxta <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Wahiaronkwas David wrote:
>
>> (For the record, even if an auto-collapse or auto-cut were instituted,
>> I wouldn't consider it censorship. An unnecessary pain in the ass to
>> write around and disproportionately beneficial to people who do *not*
>> want to read what I've written, maybe, but not censorship.)
>>
>> ~ Rachel
>>
>> I wasn't calling the lengthy entry auto cut censorship, rather the
>> removing Twitter automatically thing. Just a clarification. I hope.
>
> Censorship is a very strong word.  Allowing people to remove
> Twitter from their reading lists on a journal service is not
> depriving them of their civil right to free expression.
>
> YMMV IMNSHO and so on.
>
_______________________________________________
dw-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss

Reply via email to