On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:06 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Instead of having to rely on userscripts, DW could give users the option > to: > > -collapse (or cut) loudtwitter > -collapse the content in posts that are over X number of characters - maybe > not collapse ALL the content, but just those than go over the limit - so > people aren't forced to scroll for multiple screens.
I like the option of clicking somewhere on an individual post to collapse that post -- but I'd want it to apply to ALL posts, not just those over a certain length. That'd deal with LoudTwitter, long posts, graphics of any kind, and short posts that put offensive content up front. > That way if people *are* interested, they click the expand and read without > reloading and without blocking the actual content - and since they opted > into it, I don't see how it could be regarded as censorship >_> I'd still prefer functionality like this to show the complete post and allow readers to collapse it, rather than auto-collapsing. (For the record, even if an auto-collapse or auto-cut were instituted, I wouldn't consider it censorship. An unnecessary pain in the ass to write around and disproportionately beneficial to people who do *not* want to read what I've written, maybe, but not censorship.) ~ Rachel -- http://www.lastsyllable.net http://bohemianeditor.dreamwidth.org This is not the sig you're looking for.
_______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
