"Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:29:02AM +0200, Jukka Salmi wrote: > > Peter Hartlich --> dwm (2008-04-08 00:22:13 +0200): > > > Whoops, sorry then. I had checked SuS, heirloom toolchest, the autoconf > > > portability manual and DJB's portability notes and none of them mentioned > > > a missing -u option. > > > > http://www.suckless.org/pipermail/dwm/2007-February/002128.html > > I doubt that is a valid assumption still, so I'm fine with the > sort -u.
It's POSIX conform [1], so I don't see the whole point of the discussion. Regards Matthias-Christian [1] http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/sort.html
