<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from cador.lan [10.0.0.100] with HTTP/1.1 (POST); Sat, 24 May 2008
23:02:09 +0100
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Sat, 24 May 2008 12:01:36 +0200, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> First it is a very bad idea to write your own licenses (see "6. License
> proliferation considered harmful").
You could make similar arguments about window managers ( only partially a
joke)
>Second this change would make the
> license incompatible with the GPL (which should be obviated even if you
> do not agree with the GPL).
If you do not agree with something, then what is the point in making effort
to support it?
