On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As already said, please read > http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/gpl-compatible.html for the answer.
Resorting to argumentum ad internetum, eh? That link is crap. The whole argument is "license your code GPL-compatible because the GPL is popular and you don't want to be unpopular." If I went by a popularity contest to decide how to behave I'd be running Windows on a Dell. Fortunately I can think for myself and I needn't rely on internet links containing GPL cheerleading to make decisions for me. Like I said before, I support the GPL, but I like the MIT license better, and I certainly don't think "everyone else is doing it" is a good reason to do ANYTHING, much less decide on the legal status of code. -- # Kurt H Maier
