Why is this heated argument on someone else's list being dragged over to DX Chat?
We![:-? tenker]()
all know the reason Lionel. Some Dxers like to screw the
"deserving" for every
penny they can, hence the upsurge in the $5 OQRS etc. If dxpeditions
cant be funded
withou having to rely on a few hundred bucks from the QSL cards, then
they shouldn't
go ! It will be interesting to see what happens with the logs of T32C
- will they or won't they?
Tom
KL7/GM4FDM
On 15/09/2011 09:57, LPPS Ltd wrote:
>
> Of course Neil - rather than direct your comments to ARRL, who I
> understand do have the question of 160 Cards and Field Checking under
> consideration, would it not be better to have a concerted effort from
> all DXers to encourage, cajole, browbeat or demand that logs are
> uploaded to LoTW instantly - they seems very able to upload to ClubLog
> and various 'online' checking facilities to whet your appetite whilst
> the expeditions are in progress so why on earth do they not do theant
> be funded
> gentlemanly thing and upload to LoTW as well - surely Neil, that's where
> your pressure should be exerted most - ARRL set up LoTW to make it easy
> for all of us to receive qsl confirmations swiftly and economically.
> That works fine - so exert your expertise with words to the expeditions
> themselves - perhaps even indirectly with our Clubs who generously
> sponsor them - this 6 month rule is ludicrous!! Same day please!!
> Lionel
> ZA/G5LP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
> Neil G0JHC
> Sent: 15 September 2011 07:10
> To: c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [CDXC] Re: Honor Roll (ST0R and checkers)
>
>
> When it arrives, It would be great if 679 of us didn't have to send our
> ST0R
> card off to Newington, and could use the UK checkers instead. One day
> you
> guys may be trusted to check them. Surely if it is a printed label I
> couldn't have moved the dot from 18MHz or doctored the card?
>
> Does anyone know the history of the 1.8MHz rule and who I would need to
> contact to begin a challenge of it?
>
> Neil G0JHC (ARRL member)
>
> From: c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
> Of
> Lauriemar
> Sent: 15 September 2011 06:49
> To: c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [CDXC] Re: Honor Roll
>
> A deleted country would not be counted on the Current list, so I assume
> this
> refers to the recent ST0R. Can't imagine how else K6ND would be ahead of
> everyone else, unless it's a mistake
> Laurie G3UML
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Sergeant <d...@davesergeant.com
> <mailto:dave%40davesergeant.com>
> <mailto:dave%40davesergeant.com> <mailto:dave%40davesergeant.com>
> >
> To: cDXC <c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:cDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:cDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:cDXC%40yahoogroups.com> >
> Sent: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 6:45
> Subject: [CDXC] Re: Honor Roll
>
> Is this for 'Southern Sudan (deleted)' or 'Republic of South Sudan'
> hich ST0R would be?
> 73 Dave G3YMC
> On 14 Sep 2011 at 18:49, Lauriemar wrote:
> > This is all quite strange. The latest edition of the DXCC standings --
> Sept 14th, 2011 -- has one single station on 341 current countries,
> K6ND. Everyone else at the top is still on 340. K6ND seems to have a
> South Sudan credit.
>
> ttp://www.davesergeant.com
>
> ------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> Individual Email | Traditional
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com
cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
"deserving" for every
penny they can, hence the upsurge in the $5 OQRS etc. If dxpeditions
cant be funded
withou having to rely on a few hundred bucks from the QSL cards, then
they shouldn't
go ! It will be interesting to see what happens with the logs of T32C
- will they or won't they?
Tom
KL7/GM4FDM
On 15/09/2011 09:57, LPPS Ltd wrote:
>
> Of course Neil - rather than direct your comments to ARRL, who I
> understand do have the question of 160 Cards and Field Checking under
> consideration, would it not be better to have a concerted effort from
> all DXers to encourage, cajole, browbeat or demand that logs are
> uploaded to LoTW instantly - they seems very able to upload to ClubLog
> and various 'online' checking facilities to whet your appetite whilst
> the expeditions are in progress so why on earth do they not do theant
> be funded
> gentlemanly thing and upload to LoTW as well - surely Neil, that's where
> your pressure should be exerted most - ARRL set up LoTW to make it easy
> for all of us to receive qsl confirmations swiftly and economically.
> That works fine - so exert your expertise with words to the expeditions
> themselves - perhaps even indirectly with our Clubs who generously
> sponsor them - this 6 month rule is ludicrous!! Same day please!!
> Lionel
> ZA/G5LP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of
> Neil G0JHC
> Sent: 15 September 2011 07:10
> To: c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [CDXC] Re: Honor Roll (ST0R and checkers)
>
>
> When it arrives, It would be great if 679 of us didn't have to send our
> ST0R
> card off to Newington, and could use the UK checkers instead. One day
> you
> guys may be trusted to check them. Surely if it is a printed label I
> couldn't have moved the dot from 18MHz or doctored the card?
>
> Does anyone know the history of the 1.8MHz rule and who I would need to
> contact to begin a challenge of it?
>
> Neil G0JHC (ARRL member)
>
> From: c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf
> Of
> Lauriemar
> Sent: 15 September 2011 06:49
> To: c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:CDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [CDXC] Re: Honor Roll
>
> A deleted country would not be counted on the Current list, so I assume
> this
> refers to the recent ST0R. Can't imagine how else K6ND would be ahead of
> everyone else, unless it's a mistake
> Laurie G3UML
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Sergeant <d...@davesergeant.com
> <mailto:dave%40davesergeant.com>
> <mailto:dave%40davesergeant.com> <mailto:dave%40davesergeant.com>
> >
> To: cDXC <c...@yahoogroups.com <mailto:cDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:cDXC%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:cDXC%40yahoogroups.com> >
> Sent: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 6:45
> Subject: [CDXC] Re: Honor Roll
>
> Is this for 'Southern Sudan (deleted)' or 'Republic of South Sudan'
> hich ST0R would be?
> 73 Dave G3YMC
> On 14 Sep 2011 at 18:49, Lauriemar wrote:
> > This is all quite strange. The latest edition of the DXCC standings --
> Sept 14th, 2011 -- has one single station on 341 current countries,
> K6ND. Everyone else at the top is still on 340. K6ND seems to have a
> South Sudan credit.
>
> ttp://www.davesergeant.com
>
> ------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> Individual Email | Traditional
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com
cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to
imail...@njdxa.org
In the message body put either
unsubscribe dx-chat
or
subscribe dx-chat
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to
imail...@njdxa.org
In the message body put either
unsubscribe dx-chat
or
subscribe dx-chat
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
