Steve, I agree to some degree; I would like the discussions about LOTW to be limited to the DX4WIN context.
Paul At 07:16 PM 10/25/03 +0100, Steve wrote: >How about a separate reflector just for LOTW ? > >And when LOTW and ARRL move on from the "beta" and actually inform software >developers of their strategic direction then modifications may be made >rather than a change for change sake ! > >Sorry but LOTW is taking up a lot of bandwidth on here recently and I'm of >the old school "if it aint broke don't fix it !!". > >This aint a flame - just an observation ;-) > >Steve ZC4BS / G4KIV
