Well like I said, I agree fundamentally but to be honest I can see both just as well at this point of my life. I'm sure a day will come that I may change that tune. Just in case anyone's wondering I'm on a 19" screen at 1600 x 1200 (thought I was at 1024 x 768 still) because I wanted to have too much open on the screen at once, (like every window) and have done so since version 4.x .
I suppose I could used to an "O" as well any other letter :O) WWMWMWM works too LOL! I think the only solution to this whole problem is to have this: CCCCCCCCCCC We all can see that one. Anyway, thanks for the bandwidth and I'm mostly just funnin' with everyone cuz' it don't much matter to me what letter is used and if the majority wants something other than "M" that's fine with me. I want all "C's" anyway :O) 73, Todd WM8C's Ham Links www.wm8c.com All emails scanned with NIS2003 ----- Original Message ----- From: Joe - WD?M To: Todd ; DX 4 Windows Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 9:12 PM Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Report Improvement Suggestion Scolded? Naaahhhh.........mildly chastised? Maybe. I use a 19 inch LCD screen.....I see absolutely everything fine otherwise....why should I have to compromise with DX4WIN? The report isn't anything I can change. Why not focus (pardon the pun) on customer satisfaction, since it's something I'd think is quite easily changed. Maybe the COLOR could be changed in the report to emphasize the differences, rather than be limited to black on white? The significant confusion factor is the consistency of vertical and slanted lines seen (pun again) in using the M and W. Here's the example: MMWMMWW MMOMMOO Which is easier to distinguish? 73, Joe WD?M (ex WL7M, which is the same upside down!) At 03:54 PM 11/1/2004, Todd wrote: >Hmmm...sounds to me like larger screens or lower screen resolutions are in >order :O) I only need reading glasses at this point but and still 1024 x >768, but could always go back to 640 x 480 if I had too :O) I agree >fundamentally with the point being made but it sounds like the screens are >either too small or resolutions too high for the user. I know it's easy >to want to get everything on the screen, but maybe time to sacrifice >something so you don't have to strain so hard to see it? Just my thoughts >and I'm sure I'll get scolded for them... >73, > >Todd >WM8C
