Ron, I did it on a 500mhz machine and it processed in about 3 seconds. I did it on a 3.5ghz and it was less than a second. In both cases, sound was turned off. I doubt it can be any faster than that!
Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Stordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: [DXBase] DXB2004 sluggish with SH/FDX/50? > I just noticed this. Connected via telnet to an AR-Cluster (mine at > dxspots.com) when I type SH/DX/50 the list comes thru very quickly, but > when I type SH/FDX/50 (i..e. formated as if the spots had arrived > normally) DXB2004 is very sluggish. What it is doing is looking at each > line and determining which I need and transfering them to the needed > spots window. This does take a little additional time, this was noticed > in DXB2003, but now it seems to take a 'long' time. > > Connecting instead using a stand alone telnet client I can verify that > SH/FDX/50 is very quick, so its not a problem with AR-Cluster. > > Assuming you have a reasonable size log, so it has a lot of looking to > do, try doing a SH/FDX/50 and see what happens so I will know it's not > only at my system. > > Ron, N5IN > > _______________________________________________ > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit: > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
