Ron, have you 'initialized' the log lately? Second. Have you used that little Access Maintainer Applet?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Stordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FireBrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Ron Stordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [DXBase] DXB2004 sluggish with SH/FDX/50? > FireBrick wrote: > > >Done it both way, couple of times. > >It's fast either way. > >I see the screen flickering and the previous qso window changing with > >sh/fdx/50. > >It's way to fast to read either way. > >My log is 45.8K > > > > > > > > > > Very interesting....wonder what is going on here. I have a 1GHz system, > so should have the horsepower. > > I have DXB2003 still installed, so I went back to that and SH/FDX/50 > completed in 5 seconds, as you say too fast to read. > DXB2004 took 33 seconds for the same command to complete. I did it > several times and it didn't vary by more than a second. > > It's processing time in DXB2004 that is responsible, if I do a SH/FDX/50 > on a separate telnet client it takes just a few seconds. And SH/DX/50 > on DXB2004 is just as quick. So clearly time is being consumed by > DXB2004 doing analysis on the spots. > > The question is, why so slow here and so fast at your QTH? > > I would appreciate it if some other DXB2004 users would do the same test. > > Ron, N5IN > > > > >
