Hi Bill in Cubsland, I agree with you. You should be able to retain the card received date. = I don't think you need both. How about an choice in the user options?
As to Bill O'Reilly, even my text leans to right. Art W2NRA > I see that if I already received a card, and mark a qso as now getting = the > LoTW confirmation, it changes the qsl received date from the card date = to > the LoTW date. > Now this isn't a major issue but. > I help a lot of people get qsl's. > Frequently they ask how long it took. > In the case of a card, I could see the sent date and the received = date. >=20 > So...while the Sent LoTW date is immaterial and the LoTW received date = isn't > either, I'd prefer that the received date not change from the qsl card > received date. > Now if no card has been received, big deal. >=20 > so is their a need for a LoTW received date column? not sure, but I = think a > card received date is more important than the LoTW received as that is > always searchable on the LoTW site, whereas the Card date is gone when = it's > overwritten. >=20 > As Bill Oreilly would say; "I'll give you the last word", "What say = you?" >=20 >=20 > ----------------------------------------------------- > If nobody measures up, it's time to check your yardstick > ----------------------------------------------------- >=20 > Bill H. in Chicagoland >=20 > _______________________________________________ > DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -=20 > To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit: > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---
