I used this database a year ago to do some corrections that had crept into
my log over the years and I found it very useful. You upload your log and it
will tell you about any errors that it detects...real nice.

Bill W5VX

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Wes N7WS
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 8:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Dxbase] PJ and UA problem

  Offered as food for thought:

There is now a big database of calls with prefix exceptions, corrections,
etc. 
that exists at clublog.org.

I don't think it would help in the time sensitivity issue you raise but it 
ultimately sorts this out almost with a "voting" process or the use of
actual 
QSL cards.

Wes  N7WS

On 9/11/2010 6:21 AM, Jack wrote:
> The concept of a downloadable reference data file for prefixes could
> certainly be done, but the success of this approach would be dependent on
a
> number of factors:
>
> 1.  Time sensitivity ... user just works xyz station and discovers that
the
> prefix selection is incorrect.  Oh, and let's make it more interesting by
> saying he/she plans to submit this to ARRL at a hamfest tomorrow.  What
does
> user do.
> 2.  Would user be able to make changes to prefix database without fear of
> the download file overwriting their changes.  If changes are made, would
> user know what changed.
> 3.  Callsign exceptions to the normal prefix selection.  Zone exceptions,
> deleted vs not deleted.
> 4.  Potential issues with cluster spots where incorrect prefix is selected
> if current logic is kept.
> 5.  How would prefix data be maintained for QSOs... part of log or not
part
> of log?  At least one logging package out there does not keep the prefix
as
> part of the QSO record.  This is viewed by many of their users as a
> significant irritation.  Personally, I wouldn't like it either.
> 6.  Data corruption during download, download interruptions, version
> differences.  Dumb users who won't recognize any of this or who just don't
> know how to download something.
>
> Just some thoughts.  I'm sure there may be other issues to reconcile in
> developing the plan.  I'm not really asking for a response to the comments
> above, I just point them out as food for thought during the design of the
> changes that are planned.
>
> Cheers Jack

______________________________________________________________
Dxbase mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Dxbase mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to