On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Urmane Hendrake wrote:

> Oh, and BTW, I think eplus expects and older version of imlib (API
> change?  Another point for changing major version numbers. (sorry,
> raster :-} I know imlib isn't officially a "production" library, but face it;
> it probably should be, as it works better than many that do make that
> claim.  Inc the major and release it as 2.0))

The only thing keeping eplus from compiling against 1.3 is the dependency
question, which will be fixed for DR11 (again via configure, ah well).  I
haven't upgraded to 1.3 yet myself, so haven't had a chance to find out
whether a binary compiled against 1.2 will still work with 1.3.

                            -Steve Langasek
-doink-

-
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the message contents: unsubscribe e-develop

Reply via email to