> While I don't agree with much of what the US government does, I do agree
> with much of what it is based upon. Namely, in this case, a person is
> innocent until proven guilty.
Those are sentiments with which I agree entirely.
> Circumstantial evidence doesn't hold up in any court of law (that
> isn't corrupt).
This is not a court. We are not required to cease thinking or
speaking about things which we cannot prove in a court of law.
CCS
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
