[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quite simply, how many people do you think look at those comments?
>
> The answer is a dismal amount .. it's a non starter.
Just like banner adds.
> Your REACH is the number of people that look at it .. your number of
> impressions.
>
> Basically "no-one" looks at those comments, it doesn't work.
You sent out 80 tests and 1 saw it. That's not no-one. It is over 1%.
> I didn't get one percent "response", I was able to establish (through
> careful checking) that only one person even happened to see the
> ("secret') message.
I was going to ask how you got that info. How did you "check"?
> (But patently, amex or walmart aren't going to get into e-gold in a
> big way because they can reach users through .. putting a message in
> the 'message' field of a spend! :) )
That depends on whether or not they think they could make money that
way...
> You may think I was being a smart arse about the 50kg reward,
If you say so...
> but even I'd pay (and I'm just a fucking
> clown), oh, I dunno, $3 per user, say, to reach active e-gold users
> for _Bananagold_ -- tonight.
According to you, you can reach (have it seen) 1 for 80mg.
> If e-gold decides to take a "Viking" approach and maintain the
> non-addyness of e-gold as a spend system, fine.
Based on experience, I think Viking will not be disappointed by e-gold.
> Screw e-gold. Wake me up when there's one (1) serious
> non-cottage-industry e-gold related enterprise.
That could be a long sleep!
CCS
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
