[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I think you have it back assward there. What e-gold should do is say > >"hey, currently were excellently suited to cottage industries - and > >small web vendors are a vast market in aggregate. Lets push e-gold as > >the ultimate way to run a mom-and-pop shop!" > > I think you are PERFECTLY RIGHT, Julian. Although you miss my drift. > Clearly, that is exactly where e-gold wants to be. And should be - for now. > And, that's exactly where it will remain. 1) Technophiles and libertarians come in early for politics, fun, money storage, investment, etc 2) Small vendors and niche vendors come for the simplicity, there are enough users to support them 3) Small vendors pull in people to buy niche or local goods 4) Some large vendor starts to support e-gold 5) People come in, attracted by the large vendor, and find a viable cluster of small vendors as well, and so they think it worthwhile to stay 6) More large vendors come in, to get the drop on the competition 7) It becomes mainstream The problem being that trying to jump straight in at stage 4 will dump you back out at stage 5 when people see it's a one trick pony. --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
