>Viking Coder wrote: >> >> [...]Everybody >> keeps saying how powerful the gold economy will be several years from now, >> and then coming up with schemes to make it pre-maturely happen today. > >Agreed, it's a bad idea to rush adoption speed - you need a minimum >number of *working* *trusted* sites taking e-gold at a mom-and-pop level >before it can expand again. Yes. That has happened. That stage has been reached. > Otherise people will come in, see it as a >one trick wonder, or as a nifty solution in search of a problem, and >ignore it in droves. > >It's exactly the same thing as the fluff over "e-commerce" before it was >actually useful, or the big fuss about "WAP phones" when there's about >three sites that support them. > --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
