> -----Original Message-----
> From: Samuel Mc Kee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 28 June 2001 10:23 AM
> To: e-gold Discussion
> Subject: [e-gold-list] FW: Charles Evans
<SNIP>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Samuel Mc Kee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 8:38 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Charles Evans
<SNIP>
> > I just heard about your lawsuit against Charles Evans. I have
> > been an enthusiastic supporter of e-gold since very nearly the
> > beginning, but now find that in good conscience I can no longer
> > use, support or recommend the system to anyone. It was a
> > ground-breaking idea, but I guess there's still e-bullion.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Samuel Mc Kee
<SNIP>
If CERN had a lawsuit against a former employee, maybe even Tim Berners-Lee,
would you abandon the Internet? Your statement belies your claimed
enthusiasm, and is an extremely hasty judgement on a matter of hearsay,
which is a private matter between Charles Evans and e-gold. Where an alleged
breach of trust by a former employee is in question, who are we to stand in
judgement based on heresay? I am prepared to become unhappy with e-gold's
lawsuit when a sufficient weight of real evidence is made public, if it ever
is.
A few people in this list (not Samuel Mc Kee until now, as far as I have
noticed) seem to be happy to perpetually bash e-gold in e-gold's own mailing
list, while some promote various scams and alternatives to e-gold. Onlookers
should not interpret this to indicate some dramatic and ominous loss of
confidence in e-gold, but should consider these matters in the context and
scale of the actual continued growth of a successful and highly useful
electronic commerce tool which is one hundred percent backed by real gold.
Ian Green
http://two-cents-worth.com/?107242
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
