SnowDog wrote:
>
> > Very cogent analysis. So, in view of this, what can be done to
> > differentiate the crooks from the honest people? The difficulty
> > arises because both are using the system in the same ways for
> > superficially similar purposes. The crooks hide in this
> > ambiguity. But fundamentally there is a *great* difference. If
> > this difference could be exposed somehow without violating
> > the honest people it would be a great advance. Some out of the box
> > thinking is needed here; something entirely new.
>
> Crooks don't like to be identified. Therefore:
> 1) They generally won't provide a proper phone number.
> 2) They usually have email addresses assigned by free 'sign-up' services.
> 3) They may not have documentation identifying themselves.
>
> Also,
> 4) They generally want to move as much money as possible as fast as
> possible.
True. But honest people may well do exactly the same things for
entirely
legitimate reasons. This does NOT *differentiate* between the two. So,
altho
this may frustrate the crooks it also violates honest people. This is
the
usual, common "let's have a police state" and "damn individual rights"
type
proposal; it is not new thinking.
CCS
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]