SnowDog wrote:
> 
> > Very cogent analysis.  So, in view of this, what can be done to
> > differentiate the crooks from the honest people?  The difficulty 
> > arises because both are using the system in the same ways for 
> > superficially similar purposes.  The crooks hide in this 
> > ambiguity.  But fundamentally there is a *great* difference.  If 
> > this difference could be exposed somehow without violating
> > the honest people it would be a great advance.  Some out of the box
> > thinking is needed here; something entirely new.
> 
> Crooks don't like to be identified. Therefore: 
> 1) They generally won't provide a proper phone number. 
> 2) They usually have email addresses assigned by free 'sign-up' services. 
> 3) They may not have documentation identifying themselves.
> 
> Also, 
> 4) They generally want to move as much money as possible as fast as
> possible.

True.  But honest people may well do exactly the same things for
entirely
legitimate reasons.  This does NOT *differentiate* between the two.  So,
altho 
this may frustrate the crooks it also violates honest people.  This is
the
usual, common "let's have a police state" and "damn individual rights"
type
proposal; it is not new thinking.  
 
CCS

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to