> Considering some of the absoloute morons and > single digit IQ losers who I have dealt with on > the internet, I would rather chew off my own arm > than let a jury of the great cyber-unwashed vote > on whether to let a scammer keep my money or > goods.
fair enough, but the system could have a safety feature where if the person who loses out in the squabble wants to protest they can pay the fee one last time themselves and send it to 5 different people to judge. Hey, its better than a total 100% repudiable currency like credit cards where the seller always loses out. And arent we all for a peoples currency where by more power is allocated to the users themselves? This gives people a near repudiable based system which is fairer than stadard credit cards, yet most of the time as final as e-gold is (most people wont be canceling payments all the time). If, the user loses the verdict twice, then he loses both fees as well as the funds. Seems to me a very fair way to decide - and one that gets many involved. As stated, you can look to get the best people to be on the juries (system would slowly work out the better ones from the ones who pick anything) OR even qualify 10-20 of the "people in the know on these lists" to maintain the verdicts. Could be a great money spinner for some full time workers outside of the company to do a great independant job. -- _______________________________________________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
