Patrick Chkoreff wrote:

...
Interesting, it never occurred to me that "thegoldcasino" might be a sneaky way of including "egold" in the name. I never even perceived the embedded "egold" substring because I most naturally parse according to English word boundaries.

Yes, as most folks do. I think that's why the law treats all this the way it does.

I just thought they called it "thegoldcasino" because "goldcasino.com" was already taken. Magic "th"? How about ordinary "the"?

It's BOTH (that's THe magic, Patrick!).


P.S. Had they called it "the-goldcasino" I probably would have wondered about it.

That would be a more-iffy case. Another, which nobody has mentioned in this debate, is the case of *****Sucks.com domains. US judges tend to look at trying to make profits on a casino differently than they'd look at paypalwarning.com and similar sites because of First Amendment concerns. JMR
















--- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.

Reply via email to