> > Thanks for an exceptionally civilized discussion. > > You see it is possible to talk about things without calling each other > > a > > "thug" as soon as there is a disagreement. > > And with more fruitful results. > > It seems that Jim defines "thug" as an individual who advocates or > participates in the initiation of force against others.
Yeah, but isn't publicly calling someone a "thug" (or any other insulting statement) already a case of initiation of force against a person, and hence the person who utters these words has declared himself a "thug" by his own definition? At least he could have cared to mention where I advocated use of force against somebody or something... Danny --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
