I suggested nowhere that paper money should be imposed on people. So, your judgement was based on assumptions.
[...]
What previous position? You are still welcome to quote me on that 'previous position'
This position:
On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 12:38 PM, Danny Van den Berghe wrote:
One can prefer to pay the 10% voluntarily, but then the disadvantage is that
some people may cheat.
You stated previously that 10% inflation (or whatever number the state planners decide is best for "the general welfare") is great for economic growth.
Above, you seem to be clearly in favor of inflation (which is nothing but disguised theft of property, and therefore of an individual's life), precisely because a _voluntary_ 10% taxation scheme wouldn't actually work.
So you clearly understand that the only way to rob an individual of 10% of his hard-earned wealth is through force and/or fraud, and inflation is both.
Yet you're fine with this, and refer to the action of protecting one's rightful property from thieves as 'cheating'.
Your values are inverted, like those of most people who've been brainwashed by the perpetrators of this fraud.
What is the Matrix?
H
http://hannibal.2cw.org
--- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when accessing your e-gold account(s) via the web and shopping cart interfaces to help thwart keystroke loggers and common viruses.
