PMC (in person John Arthrone) suggested a conference call to discussion options. I post the details once they are set.
2014-08-27 12:26 GMT+02:00 Lars Vogel <lars.vo...@gmail.com>: > Sounds like we all happily agree so far. I send an email to the PMC > mailing list asking for approval for this change. > > Best regards, Lars > > > 2014-08-27 11:35 GMT+02:00 Olivier Prouvost <olivier.prouv...@opcoach.com> > : > > >> Hi, >> >> For me it is +10 ! This is a main step for the E4 success. >> >> Tell me if I can help. >> >> Olivier >> >> >> >> >> >> <http://www.opcoach.com> >> >> Olivier Prouvost >> <olivier.prouv...@opcoach.com?subject=Demande%20de%20renseignements> >> >> Formation et Expertise Eclipse <http://www.opcoach.com/> >> >> *Mobile : +33 (0)6 28 07 65 64 <%2B33%20%280%296%2028%2007%2065%2064>* >> >> [image: Member] >> <http://www.eclipse.org/membership/showMember.php?member_id=987> >> >> >> >> Le 26 août 2014 à 21:42, Lars Vogel <lars.vo...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> I think the main issue people have with the e4 tools is that they cannot >> install from directly from the update site of the Eclipse release. I >> asked in the cross mailing list how the e4 tools can be part of the Mars >> update site. >> >> Wayne explained that we would have to move the e4 tools to a new project. >> Here is his explanation how to do it: >> ---------------------------- >> >> To move the code out of the project, you need to do a restructuring >> review. Restructuring reviews are relatively simple affairs that require >> you describe (as concisely as possible) what needs to to change and why. >> >> To restructure by moving, you need a project to move the code into. >> >> This could be an existing project (e.g. PDT), or one that we create. If a >> new project is required, then we need to do a proposal followed by a >> creation review. We can combine the creation review with the restructuring >> review. >> >> There's more here: >> >> https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Restructuring_Reviews >> >> HTH, >> >> Wayne >> >> ------------------ >> >> If the active e4 committers and our users agree, I personally think we >> should go ahead and create this structuring review. >> >> How do people think about this? Should we go ahead with this >> restructuring review? >> >> Best regards, Lars >> >> P.S. I would be interesting to work on the restructuring review. >> _______________________________________________ >> e4-dev mailing list >> e4-dev@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> e4-dev mailing list >> e4-dev@eclipse.org >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev >> > >
_______________________________________________ e4-dev mailing list e4-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
