I'm more referring to some of the long standing bugs. The feature requests should be considered secondary.
This bug: http://www.intellij.net/tracker/idea/viewSCR?publicId=2647 has been around a number of builds, has the second highest number of votes and doesn't sound like it would be a killer to fix. Regards, Glen > Well, I can't speak for IntelliJ, but some of the top voted issues are > not a quick fix (read serious loads of work and potentially destablizing > as we draw near to the Adriana finish) and some of the issues also have > limited appeal. Yes, there is a small group of people who clamor for > this or that feature but the broad appeal is thin. On the non-trivial > side of things, thorough support of something like AspectJ is not a > trivial task. I don't expect that an issue with comparable complexity > can be realistically accomplished in time for Adriana, but will likely > get good attention in the planning stage for the post-Adriana feature > set. The IntelliJ guys accomplish so much that it skews one's > perspective into thinking they can get everything into Adriana. > > Cheers, > Jon > > Glen Stampoultzis wrote: > >> I've been noticing that the top voted bugs have been sitting around >> unfixed for many versions. Does Intellij actually look at the votes >> when deciding what to fix? > > _______________________________________________ Eap-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
