But that's not true, all votes should be returned to those who had voted after the request was fixed. So, actually, there were much more tracker issues with votes > 0, that were fixed. Now these issues have vote number = 0.
I've found 4 fixed requests, that have > 0 votes left, but it was just bug in tracker, that these votes were not nullified. Regards, Sergey Dmitriev JetBrains s.r.o. http://www.intellij.com "Develop with pleasure!" "Bertel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message ama2l9$val$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:ama2l9$val$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I think in general that the IntelliJ team select the right things to fix but > if they do that, and don't look at the votes at all, why do then waist time > and the votes on voting? > > Some builds ago (644) I looked into the list and counted up: > > We have together voted for 421 features/bugs and used 10759 votes on it. > Only 5 out of 497 fixes is something we voted for, and we only used 91 voted > for it. > > Now there is more fixes, but none that we voted for. I'm going to save the > rest of my votes for the next EAP. At that time the team properly will have > more time to look at the votes. > > Any way... you are right that the top voted issues is not small fixes, but > there is still a lot of simple things that people have voted for. > > > /Bertel > > > > "Jon Steelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > am8oaq$g8l$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:am8oaq$g8l$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well, I can't speak for IntelliJ, but some of the top voted issues are > > not a quick fix (read serious loads of work and potentially destablizing > > as we draw near to the Adriana finish) and some of the issues also have > > limited appeal. Yes, there is a small group of people who clamor for > > this or that feature but the broad appeal is thin. On the non-trivial > > side of things, thorough support of something like AspectJ is not a > > trivial task. I don't expect that an issue with comparable complexity > > can be realistically accomplished in time for Adriana, but will likely > > get good attention in the planning stage for the post-Adriana feature > > set. The IntelliJ guys accomplish so much that it skews one's > > perspective into thinking they can get everything into Adriana. > > > > Cheers, > > Jon > > > > Glen Stampoultzis wrote: > > > I've been noticing that the top voted bugs have been sitting around > unfixed for many versions. Does Intellij actually look at the votes when > deciding what to fix? > > > > _______________________________________________ Eap-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-bugs
