Which version does it? I use 2.5 Build536. So the folks from IntelliJ seems to be faster than me :)
---------------------------------------------------------- Thomas Rekittke entory AG c/o IT/e-Business Applications comdirect Bank AG Tel.: +49 (0)4106/704-1945 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Seebeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Eap-features] Code complition in Strings > > > > > "Rekittke, Thomas" wrote: > > > > I requested this several times: > > > > The code-completion (no spell-checking or someting like this) within > > strings, comments (javadoc) is crucial. I often refer to > other parts of my > > class with {@link methodAbc} and it is so annoying, > IntelliJ does not > > complete {@link m| for me. > > Code completion works fine within @link-tags. I use it every time. > > > > > Thomas > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Thomas Rekittke > > entory AG > > c/o IT/e-Business Applications > > comdirect Bank AG > > Tel.: +49 (0)4106/704-1945 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alexey A. Efimov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:52 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [Eap-features] Code complition in Strings > > > > > > > > > I think NO. Becose it's not Office Editor like Start Office or MS > > > Office. I think too what light editor is cool editor, but > if IntelliJ > > > come by wieght to Jbuilder (fat slower editor, with more > > > features) I not > > > longer use it. I use IntelliJ that it's faster Java IDE > of all avaible > > > IDE and it's eat to small memory. So, xemacs is > overloaded editor by > > > self features, no body not use all feature complitely, > but xemacs size > > > of distribute -is more what 22 MB, for language of C is > too much, very > > > much. And xemacs using not only for Java coding (list of supported > > > languages over 30 items, and more). You can't compare this > > > two editors. > > > IntelliJ is only oriented Java editor? and it must be > Java editor, and > > > no more else. > > > > > > My appenion - IntelliJ not spell checker or spell > compliter, than it's > > > not need to add this feature. And more of > realy-need-feature not added > > > yet. Let's point to priority. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Alexey Efimov - Software Engineer > > > Sputnik Labs > > > 1st Kolobovsky per., 6/3 > > > Moscow, 103051, Russia > > > Phone: +7 (095) 725 5444 > > > Direct: +7 (501) 401 3217 > > > Fax: +7 (095) 725 5443 > > > E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.spklabs.com > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jonas Kvarnstr�m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:39 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [Eap-features] Code complition in Strings > > > > > > > > > Johannes Schneider wrote: > > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > > > >I would like code complition in Strings. > > > > > > > >E.g. > > > > > > > > > > > ><% > > > > String name = request.getParameter("n > > > > > > > > > > > >Now a working Ctrl-Space would be great. > > > >The same problem occures within comments... > > > > > > > > > > I agree. This wouldn't necessarily have to be an > > > "intelligent" *code* > > > completion but it could be an intelligent *word* completion > > > similar to > > > dabbrev-expand in Emacs. This function expands a word > from similar > > > words close in the same buffer, and as you step through the > > > expansions > > > it continues searching farther and farther away from the > completion > > > point, eventually into other buffers. > > > > > > If I wrote this in Emacs I could write co<Meta-slash> and > "co" would > > > expand to "completion". If I pressed Meta-slash again it > > > would change > > > to "continues", then to "code".... > > > > > > I miss this very much in IDEA. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eap-features mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Eap-features mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------- > > Diese eMail wurde durch einen Geschaeftspartner der comdirect bank > > vom eMail Server der comdirect bank AG verschickt. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Eap-features mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > > _______________________________________________ > Eap-features mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features > _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
