Strange thing, one actually should deal with indirect testcase inheritance. We have same hierarchy here.
-- Best regards, Maxim Shafirov JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software http://www.intellij.com "Develop with pleasure!" "Barry Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Maxim Shafirov wrote: > > does the code that assigns this variable is under source root? If no please > > add it there so inspection could search for that usage. If yes would you > > please provide me with that code so I could analyze the problem. > > I will do so. In the mean time: > > I've noticed that test methods in test cases that *indirectly* inherit > from TestCase are not considered as entry points. (Previously, I did not > fully understand what the checkboxes in the inspect dialog were for. I > thought it might actually modify the code, so I always turned them off.) > > public class AbstractTestTest extends TestCase { > ... > } > > public void ConcreteTestCase extends AbstractTestCase { > ... > public void testSomething() {...} > } > > The above example represents 95% of our test methods, effectively making > the auto-entry option null. > > _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
