I agree with Eugene. There are just a small number of main entry points into an application, but there might be a large number of main-classes, that are called only in a very special meaning, e.g. when running a special test case.
Why user B should have all Run/Debug configurations, that only user A needed to fix bugs x, y and z? Tom On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:56:55 +0400, "Eugene Zhuravlev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I would disagree. Generally different members of a team run/debug > different tasks (tests for example or various configurations of the same > program) and thus may have different numbers of run/debug entries. This > should not be shared together with the common project structure. > > -- > > Best regards, > Eugene Zhuravlev > JetBrains, Inc, http://www.intellij.com > "Develop with pleasure!" > > > "Amnon I. Govrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > ama8aj$9nc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:ama8aj$9nc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, people. > > > > If you agree with #4090, please vote for it. > > > > Here is a transcript: > > In my opinion, running and debugging entries (RunManager component)should > be > > in the ipr and not iws file. > > It seems that the ipr contains global project settings (paths, output > > directory, etc.) and iws contains user-related settings (e.g. SourceSafe > > integration). > > I think that running and debugging entries fall in the global category > since > > the project is run the same way every time (at least for everyone in the > > project that I am part of). If it weren't for this, we would have checked > > only the ipr in, but now we are forced to check in the iws as well which > > causes many problems (e.g. if the SourceSafe settings are set). > > Please take care of this, I hope it makes sense and that I am not alone. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Amnon > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
