Solution: don't give your key to anyone else....? Maybe that's the
point. :-) At least, I think it is an individual (per user) license, not
a floating one? If I'm wrong, its an even better deal...
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Wannamaker 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: AW: [Eap-list] OFFTOPIC: Idea for personal use
> 
> 
> Is the security model for licenses correct?  If someone tries 
> to start 
> another copy of IDEA with the same license key, IDEA tells me 
> someone is 
> accessing the key, great, then it informs me that it is 
> saving my stuff, 
> again great, and that it is shutting ME down, not great.  I 
> was first in, I 
> should have priority, otherwise we're going to have about 20 
> seconds to make 
> changes before someone else clobbers you?
> 
> --ekiM
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 18 December 2001 02:25 pm, you wrote:
> > Well, in my opinion a nice way to compensate initial costs 
> of software is a
> > period of time for free updates and nicely priced updates 
> afterwards. By
> > the way, after buying IDEA you have 8 months of free 
> updates. What if I
> > purchase an update after 10 months or so. Do I get another 
> 8 months of free
> > updates then or does this count for full versions only?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im
> > > Auftrag von Chris Merrill
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2001 20:15
> > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Betreff: Re: [Eap-list] OFFTOPIC: Idea for personal use
> > >
> > > Wangjammer5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > > FWIW, IDEA is really great. However I do not feel that 
> many individuals
> > > > are happy to pay that kind of money for an IDE, 
> especially when you can
> > > > refresh your eval key quite easily. After all, at the 
> end of the day
> > > > you can always go back to "vi" and "javac" for free.
> > >
> > > Most of those people won't buy it...no matter how cheap it is...
> > > because they're cheap and/or lazy....they will use whatever
> > > they can for free.
> > >
> > > > My point? I think everyone would sell a lot more 
> software if it was
> > > > much cheaper. You can buy a computer game for $50 or 
> less (which is too
> > > > much for a game!). I think that's about the maximum the 
> bulk of people
> > > > can stomach for software.
> > >
> > > The market disagrees with you...they are buying LOTS of $50 games.
> > >
> > > > Why do you think half the world has a ripped off copy of Adobe
> > > > Photoshop on their hard disk?
> > >
> > > Because they are dishonest, cheap and lazy.  They wouldn't buy it
> > > if it was $1...if they could still get it for free.
> > >
> > > > Isn't it a case of 100,000 users @ $50 rather than 
> $1,000 @ $200 ?
> > >
> > > You're assuming that lowering the prices would raise the number
> > > of sales...but if they could get a disabled version of 
> something else
> > > for free...they will use it, instead of IDEA.  Even you 
> think that $50
> > > is too much.
> > >
> > > IDEA is already VERY competetively priced.  By your 
> logic...if they
> > > made it $1, they would sell 1,000,000 copies.  Not likely.
> > >
> > > I think wise move is to let them continue to download free keys.
> > > Eventually they might buy it, when they have the money.  If not,
> > > at least they will tell their friends about it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Eap-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Eap-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> 
> -- 
> --ekiM
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Eap-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
> 

_______________________________________________
Eap-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list

Reply via email to