For a debunking of Lindzen's latest WSJ Op-ed, see: http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2006/06/lindzen_in_wsj.php http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/26/wsj-gore/
For a debunking of a previous Lindzen WSJ op-ed which covered much the same ground, see the folks at RealClimate: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/04/open-thread-on-lindzen-op-ed-in-wsj/ http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/04/lindzen-point-by-point/ And for an analysis of Lindzen's House of Lords testimony from last year: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/02/richard-lindzens-hol-testimony/ Daniel Gruner said the following on 2006-06-27 00:22: > Ecologgers: > > please see this op-ed on the WSJ. > > > > URL for this article: > http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115127582141890238.html > > June 26, 2006 > [] > > COMMENTARY > > There Is No 'Consensus' On Global Warming > By RICHARD S. LINDZEN > June 26, 2006; Page A14
