The problem is that it's (almost) always the "religionists" trying to 
instigate squabbles with scientists.  I know of no scientists who have 
walked into a church and demand that evolution be included as 
an "alterantive" to their preachings.  It's always the "religionists" 
wanting religion be treated as an equal to science.  They constantly 
challenge established scientific knowledge without provocation, presumably 
as a result of insecurity about their own.  I for one would have no 
problem if they kept their preachings inside their churches and did not 
try to interfere with other aspects of lives with them.  This goes not 
only for schools (where science belongs, not religion), but also for 
politics, public policy making, etc.  Many scientists maintain appropriate 
levels of respect for religion and religionists, but the reciprocal is 
virtually non-existent.  

George Wang


On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:30:17 -0400, Marcus Ricci 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>a lurker responds.  i think a "letter of policy statement" coming from ESA
>is a good idea.  i think that it could be done, respectfully, stating that
>1) the two fields - science and religion - are fundamentally different, 
one
>based on theory and fact grounded by (usually) physical evidence, and the
>other based primarily on faith in a supreme being of some sort, and that 
2)
>the two should not attempt to resolve/explain each others' questions.
>
>if the religionists would be willing to not discredit/disrepect what
>scientists are trying to do, in our arena of public schools - explain the
>workings of the universe through OUR ideology - would scientists be 
willing to let religionists do what they want to do, if kept in their 
arena of
>churches/synagogues/worship houses and parochial schools: explain the
>workings of the universe through their "god"?
>
>greenly,
>marcus
>
>Marcus Ricci, M.S.
>Urban Conservation Specialist
>Lucas Soil & Water Conservation District
>130-A West Dudley Street
>Maumee, OH  43537
>419-893-1966 phone, 419-893-3131 fax
>work:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>personal:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Reply via email to